Why one can’t compare Gandhiji’s Civil Disobedience Movement with the Shaheenbagh Anti CAA protest.

Why one can’t compare Gandhiji’s Civil Disobedience Movement with the Shaheenbagh Anti CAA protest.

  1. Gandhiji and his followers were protesting against laws passed by a Ruler who was not elected by the people of India; whereas the Anti CAA protest was essentially against the democratically elected Government’s legislation.

  2. The disobedience of Gandhiji was a necessity because there was neither political or judicial recourse to challenge the Rowlatt Act; whereas the Shaheenbagh protesters had access to the Constitutional Courts to challenge the CAA legislation.
  3. Gandhiji’s Disobedience was not only an absolute necessity for challenging the legislation itself but also an effort to challenge the very legality of British Rule over India and Indians. This meant that all other aspects of public interest, such a loss of revenue, blockade of movement of public, etc. were not relevant. However, precisely because the Shaheenbagh protesters had alternative remedies, issues of public losses, and inconvenience become relevant. In fact, our Indian Courts have consistently held the issue of losses to the public at large caused by the protest of paramount importance, be it the Jaat reservation agitation in Haryana or the Maratha issue in Mumbai and Maharashtra or even lawyers going on strike.

While the right to protest is a constitutional right and must be jealously guarded as such, lawlessness and blockades in the name of protests is no longer “acceptable”. The sooner we understand and accept this reality, the better it would be for us as citizens and as a nation.

Author –

Rohit Rao N

Principal Partner, Veritas Legis


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Disclaimer & Confirmation

The Bar Council prohibits us from soliciting and/or advertising for work.

    • That the user has not been subjected to any kind of solicitation, inducement, invitation, advertisement – personal or otherwise, for work, from Veritas Legis or any of its members, employees, agents, representative or anyone claiming or acting through or under Veritas Legis, either through this website or through any other means.


    • That the user is aware that by entering this website, there is no creation of any lawyer-client relationship between the user and Veritas Legis.


  • That the user is entering this website on his/her own volition with an intention to obtain knowledge and/or information about Veritas Legis and/or its members and for personal use. Any action taken by the user solely on the basis of the information available on the website is his/her own decision and does not in any manner make Veritas Legis or any of its members liable for any consequences.